Brute strength will not win in a war with physics. Smart design predicts the resonance of a building and sidesteps the waves.
In other words, it ain't the meat, its the motion. This video explains how building height and stiffness interact with the natural frequency of particular seismic zones.
Transcript:
Earthquakes have always been a terrifying phenomenon, and they've become more deadly as our cities have grown, with collapsing buildings posing one of the largest risks. Why do buildings collapse in an earthquake and how can it be prevented?
If you've watched a lot of disaster films, you might have the idea that building collapse is caused directly by the ground beneath them shaking violently or even splitting apart. But that's not really how it works. For one thing, most buildings are not located right on a fault line, and the shifting tectonic plates go much deeper than building foundations.
So what's going on? In fact, the reality of earthquakes and their effect on buildings is a bit more complicated.
Two-dimensional models help visualize the simple issues
To make sense of it, architects and engineers use models like a two-dimensional array of lines representing columns and beams, or a single line lollipop with circles representing the building's mass. Even when simplified to this degree, these models can be quite useful, as predicting a building's response to an earthquake is primarily a matter of physics.
Most collapses that occur during earthquakes aren't caused by the earthquake itself. Instead, when the ground moves beneath a building, it displaces the foundation and lower levels, sending shock waves through the rest of the structure and causing it to vibrate back and forth.
The strength of this oscillation depends on two main factors:
- The building's mass, which is concentrated at the bottom
- Its stiffness, which is the force required to cause a certain amount of displacement
Along with the building's material type and the shape of its columns, stiffness is largely a matter of height. Shorter buildings tend to be stiffer, so they are less likely to shift, while taller buildings are more flexible.
Height matters, but not how you think
You might think that the solution is to build shorter buildings so that they shift as little as possible, but the 1985 Mexico City earthquake is an excellent example of why that's not the case. During that quake, many buildings between 6 and 15 stories tall collapsed. What's strange is that while shorter buildings nearby did keep standing, buildings taller than 15 stories were also less damaged, and the mid-sized buildings that collapsed were observed shaking far more violently than the earthquake itself.
How is that possible? The answer has to do with something known as a natural frequency. In an oscillating system, the frequency is how many back and forth movement cycles occur within a second.
This is the inverse of the period, which is how many seconds it takes to complete one cycle.
And a building's natural frequency, determined by its mass and stiffness, is the frequency that its vibrations will tend to cluster around. Increasing a building's mass slows down the rate at which it naturally vibrates while increasing stiffness makes it vibrate faster.
You can tune a building to earthquake resonance
So in the equation representing their relationship, stiffness and natural frequency are proportional to one another, while mass and natural frequency are inversely proportional.
What happened in Mexico City was an effect called resonance, where the frequency of the earthquake's seismic waves happened to match the natural frequency of the mid-sized buildings. Like a well-timed push on a swing set, each additional seismic wave amplified the building's vibration in its current direction, causing it to swing even further back and so on, eventually reaching a far greater extent than the initial displacement.
Today, engineers work with geologists and seismologists to predict the frequency of earthquake motions at building sites to prevent resonance-induced collapses, taking into account factors such as soil type and fault type, as well as data from previous quakes.
Low frequencies of motion will cause more damage to taller and more flexible buildings, while high frequencies of motion pose more threat to structures that are shorter and stiffer.
Engineers have also devised ways to absorb shocks and limit deformation using innovative systems: Base isolation uses flexible layers to isolate the foundation's displacement from the rest of the building, while tuned mass damper systems cancel out resonance by oscillating out of phase with the natural frequency to reduce vibrations.
In the end, it's not the sturdiest buildings that will remain standing, but the smartest ones.
#BuildSmart
—This video is from Ted-Ed, prepared by Vicki V. May, Ph.D., of the Dartmouth School of Engineering. You can dig deeper on the topic at the Ted-Ed website.